DOCENTIA: Support Program for Evaluating the Quality of University Faculty Teaching

The DOCENTIA Program consists of a set of guidelines and recommendations for universities to develop a model for evaluating the quality of teaching, aimed at ensuring the qualifications and competence of university faculty through an assessment of their teaching activities, with the goal of promoting their recognition and improvement. These models are certified by ANECA and the regional agencies.
Under the current framework of the Spanish university system, the responsibility for ensuring the training and competence of faculty lies with the universities. Universities must develop procedures for evaluating faculty performance, as well as for their training and professional development, ensuring their qualifications and teaching competence. To support this evaluation of teaching, ANECA launched the Program to Support the Evaluation of University Faculty Teaching Activity (DOCENTIA) in 2007, in close coordination with regional evaluation agencies.
The DOCENTIA Program is based on the quality assurance recommendations set forth in the document Criteria and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area, which was approved by the Conference of Ministers who signed the Bologna Declaration in May 2015. Furthermore, the program’s design has taken into account the standards established by internationally recognized organizations in the field of personnel evaluation, such as The Personnel Evaluation Standards, developed by The Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation.
Interested universities must complete the application to participate in the faculty teaching evaluation support program (DOCENTIA) and submit it to ANECA.
General guidelines for the processes
The phases involved in the implementation of the DOCENTIA Program are as follows:
| Phase I | Phase II | Phase III | Phase IV | Phase V |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DESIGN | EXTERNAL EVALUATION OF THE DESIGNS | MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION | CERTIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION MONITORING | CERTIFICATION RENEWAL |
| The university develops the teaching evaluation manual in accordance with the DOCENTIA model and submits it to the relevant Agency for evaluation. | The purpose is to verify compliance with the specifications and criteria of the DOCENTIA model. Universities whose manuals have been positively evaluated begin implementation and submit an annual report to the Agency. | Las universidades cuyos diseños han sido evaluados positivamente inician la implantación y envían un informe anual a la Agencia. | Once the design has been fully implemented and the monitoring phase has been successfully completed, universities may apply for certification of their evaluation procedures. Once implementation has been certified, the university must submit an annual certification monitoring report. | Once the certification period has expired, provided the final monitoring report is favorable. |
| Certification of a program under the DOCENTIA program is valid for six years. During the first five years, the university will submit annual follow-up reports on the certification, and in the sixth year, it will submit a certification renewal report (see Annex A.VI). | ||||
To support universities in designing their own mechanisms to manage the quality of teaching staff’s teaching activity and encourage their development and recognition, the DOCENTIA procedure refers to the recommendations for ensuring quality at higher education institutions, collected in the document Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (2015) which was approved by the Conference of Ministers signatories of the Bologna Declaration in May 2015. The procedure design has also taken into account the standards set by internationally recognised organisations in the field of personnel evaluation, such as The Personnel Evaluation Standards, developed by The Joint Committee of Standards for Educational Evaluation.
Currently, more than 90% of universities participate in this procedure, throughout its different phases.
Supporting documents and tools
For the evaluation of designs, monitoring of implementation and certification of evaluation procedures, the agencies participating in the DOCENTIA programme have developed the following documentation and tools based on the integration and updating of the previous programme documentation.
Evaluation reports
You can access the results of the DOCENTIA programme for all universities and also the evaluation reports for universities in the ANECA environment at the link below.
List of entities certified under the program
The table lists the institutions that have obtained a certificate confirming the implementation of their faculty evaluation model in accordance with the DOCENTIA program. The certificate is valid for six years and is renewable. However, during its validity period, the institutions must successfully complete the required annual follow-up activities.
-
RUCT Code Nº UCR Date of Issuance Date of Last Renewal Expiration Date University Certifying Agency 23 DOC13UAM/03 31/12/2013 08/02/2021 08/02/2027 Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Fundación Madrid+d y ANECA 56 DOC13URJC/04 31/12/2013 31/12/2020 31/12/2026 Universidad Rey Juan Carlos Fundación Madrid+d y ANECA 68 DOC13UFV/05 31/12/2013 31/12/2013 31/12/2025 Universidad Francisco de Vitoria Fundación Madrid+d y ANECA 4 DOC14UB/06 15/10/2009/14 01/01/2022 01/01/2028 Universitat de Barcelona AQU Catalunya y ANECA 22 DOC14UAB/07 15/10/2009/14 01/01/2022 01/01/2028 Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona AQU Catalunya y ANECA 43 DOC14UDG/08 15/10/2009/14 01/01/2022 01/01/2028 Universitat de Girona AQU Catalunya y ANECA 44 DOC14UDL/09 15/10/2009/14 01/01/2022 01/01/2028 Universitat de Lleida AQU Catalunya y ANECA 24 DOC14UPC/10 15/10/2009/14 01/01/2022 01/01/2028 Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya AQU Catalunya y ANECA 39 DOC14UPF/11 15/10/2009/14 01/01/2022 01/01/2028 Universitat Pompeu Fabra AQU Catalunya y ANECA 42 DOC14URV/12 15/10/2009/14 01/01/2022 01/01/2028 Universitat Rovira i Virgili AQU Catalunya y ANECA 43 DOC15UJI/13 2/10/2015 22/06/2021 22/06/2027 Universitat Jaume I AVAP y ANECA 52 DOC16UAN/15 26/07/2016 07/02/2023 07/02/2029 Universidad Antonio de Nebrija Fundación Madrid+d y ANECA 62 DOC16UIC/16 22/09/2016 12/07/2023 11/07/2029 Universitat Internacional de Catalunya AQU Catalunya y ANECA 41 DOC16URLL/17 22/09/2016 12/07/2023 11/07/2029 Universitat Ramon Llull AQU Catalunya y ANECA 2 DOC18UEX/18 17/07/2018 17/07/2024 Universidad de Extremadura ANECA 20 DOC19UPV-EHU/19 18/01/2019 24/02/2025 24/02/2031 Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea UNIBASQ y ANECA 29 DOC19UAH/19 13/11/2019 13/11/2025 Universidad de Alcalá Fundación Madrid+d y ANECA 26 DOC22ULPGC/22 22/02/2022 22/02/2024 22/02/2028 Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria ACCUEE y ANECA 010 DOC23UCM/23 07/02/2023 07/02/2029 Universidad Complutense de Madrid Fundación Madrid+d y ANECA 27 DOCENTIA25UPV/24 27/01/2025 27/01/2031 Universidad Politécnica de Valencia AVAP y ANECA 054 DOC26UOC/25 18-03-2026 18-03-2032 Universitat Oberta de Catalunya AQU Catalunya and ANECA
Registration of certified entities in the program
The table shows the record of entities that have obtained a certificate for the implementation of their teaching activity assessment model in accordance with the DOCENTIA programme. The certificate has a validity period of six renewable years. Even so, during the period of validity, the planned annual monitoring activities must be passed.
| RUCT Code | Nº UCR | Date of grant | Date of last renewal | Expiration date | Name of the University | Certification Agency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 | DOC13UAM/03 | 31/12/2013 | 08/02/2021 | 08/02/2027 | Universidad Autónoma de Madrid | Fundación Madrid+d y ANECA |
| 56 | DOC13URJC/04 | 31/12/2013 | 31/12/2020 | 31/12/2026 | Universidad Rey Juan Carlos | Fundación Madrid+d y ANECA |
| 68 | DOC13UFV/05 | 31/12/2013 | 31/12/2013 | 31/12/2025 | Universidad Francisco de Vitoria | Fundación Madrid+d y ANECA |
| 4 | DOC14UB/06 | 15/10/2009/14 | 01/01/2022 | 01/01/2028 | Universitat de Barcelona | AQU Catalunya y ANECA |
| 22 | DOC14UAB/07 | 15/10/2009/14 | 01/01/2022 | 01/01/2028 | Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona | AQU Catalunya y ANECA |
| 43 | DOC14UDG/08 | 15/10/2009/14 | 01/01/2022 | 01/01/2028 | Universitat de Girona | AQU Catalunya y ANECA |
| 44 | DOC14UDL/09 | 15/10/2009/14 | 01/01/2022 | 01/01/2028 | Universitat de Lleida | AQU Catalunya y ANECA |
| 24 | DOC14UPC/10 | 15/10/2009/14 | 01/01/2022 | 01/01/2028 | Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya | AQU Catalunya y ANECA |
| 39 | DOC14UPF/11 | 15/10/2009/14 | 01/01/2022 | 01/01/2028 | Universitat Pompeu Fabra | AQU Catalunya y ANECA |
| 42 | DOC14URV/12 | 15/10/2009/14 | 01/01/2022 | 01/01/2028 | Universitat Rovira i Virgili | AQU Catalunya y ANECA |
| 43 | DOC15UJI/13 | 2/10/2015 | 22/06/2021 | 22/06/2027 | Universitat Jaume I | AVAP y ANECA |
| 52 | DOC16UAN/15 | 26/07/2016 | 07/02/2023 | 07/02/2029 | Universidad Antonio de Nebrija | Fundación Madrid+d y ANECA |
| 62 | DOC16UIC/16 | 22/09/2016 | 12/07/2023 | 11/07/2029 | Universitat Internacional de Catalunya | AQU Catalunya y ANECA |
| 41 | DOC16URLL/17 | 22/09/2016 | 12/07/2023 | 11/07/2029 | Universitat Ramon Llull | AQU Catalunya y ANECA |
| 2 | DOC18UEX/18 | 17/07/2018 | 17/07/2024 | Universidad de Extremadura | ANECA | |
| 20 | DOC19UPV-EHU/19 | 18/01/2019 | 24/02/2025 | 24/02/2031 | Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea | UNIBASQ y ANECA |
| 29 | DOC19UAH/19 | 13/11/2019 | 13/11/2025 | Universidad de Alcalá | Fundación Madrid+d y ANECA | |
| 26 | DOC22ULPGC/22 | 22/02/2022 | 22/02/2024 | 22/02/2028 | Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria | ACCUEE y ANECA |
| 010 | DOC23UCM/23 | 07/02/2023 | 07/02/2029 | Universidad Complutense de Madrid | Fundación Madrid+d y ANECA | |
| 27 | DOCENTIA25UPV/24 | 27/01/2025 | 27/01/2031 | Universidad Politécnica de Valencia | AVAP y ANECA |
Pautas generales de los procesos
Las universidades interesadas deberán cumplimentar la solicitud de participación en el programa de apoyo a la evaluación docente del profesorado (DOCENTIA) y enviarla a ANECA.
-
- Fase I: DISEÑO. La universidad realiza el diseño del manual de evaluación de la actividad docente de acuerdo al modelo DOCENTIA y lo remite a la Agencia correspondiente para su evaluación.
- Fase II: EVALUACIÓN EXTERNA DE LOS DISEÑOS. Tiene por objeto reconocer el cumplimiento de las especificaciones y criterios del modelo DOCENTIA.
- Fase III: SEGUIMIENTO DE LA IMPLANTACIÓN. Las universidades cuyos diseños han sido evaluados positivamente inician la implantación y envían un informe anual a la Agencia.
- Fase IV: CERTIFICACIÓN Y SEGUIMIENTO DE LA CERTIFICACIÓN. Una vez implantado el diseño al completo y superada la fase de seguimiento favorablemente, las universidades podrán optar a la certificación de sus procedimientos de evaluación. Una vez certificada la implantación, la universidad deberá enviar un informe anual de seguimiento de la certificación.
- Fase V: RENOVACIÓN DE LA CERTIFICACIÓN. Una vez alcanzado el periodo de vigencia de la certificación, si el último informe de seguimiento es favorable.
La certificación de un modelo bajo el programa DOCENTIA tiene una vigencia de 6 años. Durante los cinco primeros años, la universidad enviará informes anuales de seguimiento de la certificación y, en el sexto año, enviará un informe de renovación de la certificación (ver anexo A.VI).
Process general guidelines
Interested universities must complete the application for participation in the teaching evaluation support programme (DOCENTIA) and send it to ANECA.
The phases that the development of the DOCENTIA Programme includes are the following:
- Phase I: DESIGN. The university designs the teaching activity evaluation manual according to the DOCENTIA model and sends it to the corresponding Agency for evaluation.
- Phase II: EXTERNAL EVALUATION OF THE DESIGNS. Its purpose is to recognise compliance with the specifications and criteria of the DOCENTIA model.
- Phase III: MONITORING OF THE IMPLEMENTATION. Universities whose designs have been positively evaluated begin the implementation and send an annual report to the Agency.
- Phase IV: CERTIFICATION AND MONITORING OF THE CERTIFICATION. Once the design has been fully implemented and the monitoring phase has been successfully completed, universities may opt for certification of their evaluation procedures. Once the implementation has been certified, the university must send an annual certification monitoring report.
- Phase V: CERTIFICATION RENEWAL. Once the certification validity period has been reached, if the last monitoring report is favourable.
The certification of a model under the DOCENTIA programme is valid for 6 years. During the first five years, the university will send annual certification monitoring reports and, in the sixth year, it will send a certification renewal report (see appendix A.VI). Application for participation in DOCENTIA.
Implications for other programs - DOCENTIA
Certification of the implementation of the teaching evaluation system (DOCENTIA) will have implications for the implementation of other evaluation programs.
-
- In the ACADEMIA program. As indicated in the evaluation criteria, positive evaluations of teaching activities accredited by quality programs such as DOCENTIA will be recognized.
- In the AUDIT program. DOCENTIA certification will exempt the institution from the evaluation of criterion 4 related to academic staff in the certification of the AUDIT program’s implementation.
- In the Institutional Accreditation of University Centers (AICU) program. DOCENTIA program certification will be taken into account in the evaluation of criterion 4 related to academic staff during the certification of the AUDIT program’s implementation.
Program committees
The DOCENTIA Program has several committees responsible for various aspects of its operations.
-
This committee is responsible for overseeing the Program, and its functions include periodically reviewing the model and procedures established to implement necessary improvements arising from the model’s implementation, as well as addressing the needs of the stakeholders involved. It consists of a chair and a secretary nominated by ANECA, along with representatives from each of the regional agencies involved in the DOCENTIA Program.
-
The mission of this panel is to evaluate the documentation prepared by universities to address the requirements of each phase of the Program. In the case of certification and recertification evaluations, the panel will also conduct on-site visits to verify the proper implementation of the model proposed by the university.
Name Position Néstor Vicente Torres Darias (U. de La Laguna) Chair María José Rodríguez Conde (U. de Salamanca) Member María José Coperías Aguilar (U. de Valencia) Member Amal Guzmán Conesa Erragbaoui (U. de Murcia) Member José Antonio Pérez de la Calle (ANECA) Secretary -
The DOCENTIA Program Evaluation Committee is responsible for carrying out the evaluation functions specific to ANECA's DOCENTIA program:
Name Position José Luis Aznarte Mellado (ANECA) Chair Sara María González Betarcor (U. de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria) Member Cristina Guilarte Martín-Calero (U. de Valladolid) Member Laura Vozmediano Sanz (U. del País Vasco) Member José Antonio Pérez de la Calle (ANECA) Secretary
Implications for other programmes
The certification of the implementation of the teaching activity evaluation design (DOCENTIA) will have consequences for the application of other evaluation programmes.
- In the renewal of degree accreditation. During the DOCENTIA certification process, we reflect on the evaluation of the different aspects of the Teaching Quality Assessment System implemented in the centre. This assessment is reflected in the evaluation report and its content will be taken into account in the process for the renewal of the accreditation of the institution's degrees (ACREDITA ). Specifically, this can be read in the Framework Document: Evaluation for the renewal of accreditation for official University bachelor's and master's degrees (pp.51 -53). In this way, the guidelines of the ACREDITA programme that appear in ANNEX 3 of the framework document of the aforementioned programme will not be subject to evaluation by the commissions during the visit undertaken for the accreditation renewal of the centre's degrees.
- In the Academia programme. As indicated in the evaluation criteria, applicants must have positive evaluations of teaching activity accredited by quality programmes such as DOCENTIA.
- In the AUDIT programme. The certification of the DOCENTIA programme will exempt the institution from the evaluation of criterion 4 related to academic staff, in the certification of the implementation of the AUDIT programme.
Program Commissions
The DOCENTIA Program has several committees responsible for various aspects of its operation.
Programme Monitoring Committee
This commission is responsible for overseeing the Programme and its functions include periodically reviewing the model and the established procedure to apply the necessary improvements resulting from the implementation of the model, as well as responding to the demands of the agents involved. It is made up of a presidency and a secretariat proposed by ANECA and a representation of each of the autonomous agencies involved in the DOCENTIA Programme.
Commission for the evaluation of the Design, Monitoring and Certification of the DOCENTIA Programme models
The mission of this panel is to evaluate the documentation that universities prepare to meet the needs of each phase of the Program. In the case of the evaluation of certification and certification renewal, they will also carry out on-site visits to certify the correct implementation of the model proposed by the university.
|
Name |
Profile |
|---|---|
| Néstor Vicente Torres Darias (U. de La Laguna) | Chairperson |
| María José Rodríguez Conde (U. de Salamanca) | Academic member |
| María José Coperías Aguilar (U. de Valencia) | Academic member |
| Amal Guzmán Conesa Erragbaoui (U. de Murcia) | Student member |
| José Antonio Pérez de la Calle (ANECA) | Secretary |
Committee for the evaluation of the AUDIT and DOCENTIA programmes
The Commission for the evaluation of the AUDIT and DOCENTIA programmes is responsible for the evaluation functions of the AUDIT and DOCENTIA programmes of ANECA.
| Name | Profile |
|---|---|
| José Luis Aznarte Mellado (ANECA) | Chair |
| Eduardo García Jiménez (U. de Sevilla) | Academic member |
| Cristina Guilarte Martín-Calero (U. de Valladolid) | Academic member |
| Laura Vozmediano Sanz (U. del País Vasco) | Academic member |
| José Antonio Pérez de la Calle (ANECA) | Secretary |